Includes: Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle Database, PostgreSQLĪll four of these relational database management systems (RDBMS) have been around for decades, and handle all-around database needs - inserting records, reading, updating, deleting records - quite well. All-around workhorses: traditional relational database management systems Here’s a rundown of the major players that Metabase supports, whether you’re new to the data space or just need a refresher. There are a lot of database and data source options out there to consider when building your data stack. For ad hoc analysis: file-based databases.All-around workhorses: traditional relational database management systems.Metabases convinces by balancing usability and advanced functionality with its SQL editor. Users require SQL background for complex querying and advanced visualizations.Ĭomparison based on Usability favors Looker for its simplicity and usability for inexperienced users. Metabase provides limited usability to non-technical users. They can easily explore Looker features for report making, customizing, and sharing. Users familiar with Google applications can easily work on Looker without requiring technical knowledge. Good quality documentation: Looker offers extensive good quality documentation for users to easily deploy and use the platform.Metabase requires some SQL expertise for complex querying. No developer dependency: Inexperienced users can easily work on Looker without developer dependency for creating data visualizations.Google Support: Looker is supported by Google and allows free integration to all Google-based data sources.For custom visualizations, Metabase relies on additional coding by skilled developers. Custom visualizations: Looker allows users to create custom reports and dashboards that are interactive and easy to share.White-labeling in Metabase is only available in the enterprise version. White-labeling: Looker offers white-labeling features for users to customize the platform to match their organizations’ branding.Metabase does not provide this analysis in its free version. ![]() Tool usage analysis: Users can monitor their usage of Looker through Google Analytics.Metabase does not provide this feature in its free version. Access Restrictions: Embedded dashboards in Looker come with access restrictions for security.Metabase lacks this diversity in its chart-type offerings. ![]() Chart-type diversity: Data visualizations in Looker come in a variety of chart types.Ease of use: Looker is known for its simple user interface that allows users to easily create dashboards and charts using drag and drop functions and ready-made report templates.The free version of Metabase offers very basic visualizations. Visualization features: Looker offers a rich set of custom visualization features for data modeling.Connects to more sources: Looker supports connections to more data sources compared to Metabase.Looker lacks this possibility and you can't create custom metrics on a blended data source. Joining data: Metabase enables you to calculate metrics even when joining different tables with each other.Hosting on your own server: Metabase – Open Source – allows customer-hosted installations on AWS, GCP, or Azure servers.Security: Admins can manage and secure access to critical data by allowing them to impose access restrictions to select tables of individual databases.This feature saves users from having to repeatedly log in to dashboards to view reports for every update. ![]() These updates and scheduled reports can be shared through email or slack.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |